As Osun State approaches the August 8, 2026 gubernatorial election, the moment demands sobriety, reflection, and an honest reckoning with the kind of leadership the state requires confronting its present challenges and securing its future. Elections are not carnivals; they are civic crossroads. They compel societies to choose not merely between individuals, but between philosophies of governance, standards of competence, and visions of collective destiny. In this defining contest, the people of Osun are presented with a stark choice between two sharply contrasting political paths: the candidacy of Munirudeen Oyebamiji, popularly known as AMBO, flying the flag of the All Progressives Congress, and the re-election bid of the incumbent governor, Ademola Adeleke, now contesting under the platform of the Accord Party after a politically telling journey across multiple parties.
This election is not simply about continuity versus change; it is about competence versus convenience, preparation versus improvisation, and institutional governance versus personality-driven politics. Osun State today stands at a delicate historical juncture. Economic pressures, public sector anxieties, infrastructural deficits, educational stagnation, and declining public confidence in governance structures all demand leadership anchored in seriousness, depth, and administrative capacity. In such times, the character and preparation of those seeking power must be interrogated with intellectual honesty and civic courage.
Leadership in a modern democratic state is not accidental. It is cultivated through years of learning, service, exposure to institutions, and progressive responsibility. Governance today requires fluency in policy analysis, budgetary discipline, intergovernmental relations, and the management of complex bureaucracies. It is within this framework that AMBO’s candidacy commands attention. His academic background, professional exposure, and administrative experience reflect a life deliberately prepared for public responsibility. Education, in this sense, is not a mere certificate; it is a way of thinking, a discipline of problem-solving, and a foundation for evidence-based decision-making. In a state grappling with intricate developmental challenges, such intellectual and professional grounding is not optional; it is indispensable.
By contrast, the public record of Governor Adeleke has persistently raised questions about preparedness and suitability for the demands of high office. The controversies that have trailed his academic qualifications are not trivial distractions; they strike at the heart of public trust. While formal education alone does not guarantee effective leadership, contested credentials undermine confidence in a system where public officers are expected to model integrity, merit, and transparency. In an era where governance increasingly relies on data, planning, and strategic foresight, intellectual readiness becomes a public asset, not a private luxury.
Beyond academic preparation lies the critical issue of administrative experience. Governance is not a stage performance; it is a continuous process of coordination, negotiation, and accountability. AMBO’s career reflects sustained engagement with administrative structures, where decisions carry consequences and leadership is measured by outcomes rather than applause. His exposure to organizational management, public service ethics, and policy execution has furnished him with an understanding of how institutions function and how they fail. Such experience is invaluable in a state that requires structural reforms rather than symbolic gestures.
Governor Adeleke’s ascent into high political office, by contrast, was abrupt and largely circumstantial. His entry into the Senate followed the unfortunate death of his elder brother, Isiaka Adeleke, Osun State’s first executive governor, who passed away while serving as a senator. That tragic event created a political vacuum filled by sympathy and family legacy rather than administrative apprenticeship. While such pathways are not uncommon in Nigerian politics, they often produce leaders who must learn governance on the job, with the state bearing the costs of experimentation and error. Osun’s recent experience has illustrated the risks inherent in such trajectories.
Politics, at its best, is a process of organic engagement with the people. It is built through years of interaction with communities, party structures, civil society, and local stakeholders. AMBO’s political journey is deeply rooted in grassroots engagement. His rise within the political system reflects patience, loyalty, and the slow accumulation of trust across wards, local governments, and party organs. This kind of grass-rooted politics fosters accountability, because the leader remains connected to the people who nurtured his political growth. It also strengthens democratic institutions by affirming the value of process over personality.
In contrast, Adeleke’s political narrative is inseparable from elite privilege and extraordinary financial capacity. Wealth and name recognition, while legitimate social realities, do not automatically translate into effective governance. The ability to mobilize resources for electoral victory does not equate to the capacity to mobilize institutions for development. When politics becomes excessively monetized, it risks eroding ideological clarity and weakening the link between leadership and service. Democracy suffers when electoral success is driven more by spectacle and spending than by substance and suitability.
Party organization is another critical dimension often overlooked in voter choices. Political parties are not mere platforms for contesting elections; they are institutions for policy formulation, leadership recruitment, and internal accountability. The APC, despite its imperfections, remains Nigeria’s most structured political organization, with national reach, ideological coherence, and mechanisms for internal regulation. AMBO’s emergence as its flag bearer is not incidental; it reflects years of participation within a disciplined political framework. Such institutional backing enhances governance by ensuring continuity, consultation, and policy alignment across levels of government.The frequent movement across political parties that has characterized Adeleke’s recent political journey raises legitimate concerns about ideological consistency and long-term vision. While political realignments are part of democratic practice, excessive cross-carpeting in search of electoral advantage weakens public confidence. Governance thrives on clarity of purpose and commitment to shared principles. When political affiliation becomes fluid and transactional, it signals uncertainty rather than conviction, and uncertainty is a dangerous foundation for leadership.
Public perception of governance is shaped not only by policies but by the comportment of those in power. Leadership carries symbolic weight, and symbols matter in shaping civic culture. However, when symbolism overwhelms substance, governance risks degenerating into performance. The image of Osun State in recent years has been dominated by theatrics that, while entertaining to some, do little to address the structural challenges confronting the state. Roads, schools, hospitals, civil service welfare, and economic planning require disciplined attention, not choreographed enthusiasm.
Osun State today faces hard questions. How will it stabilize its finances? How will it restore confidence among public servants? How will it improve educational outcomes and stem youth unemployment? How will it position itself competitively within the regional and national economy? These questions demand sober answers rooted in policy expertise, administrative competence, and collaborative leadership. They cannot be resolved through symbolism alone.AMBO’s candidacy speaks directly to these imperatives. His profile reflects steadiness rather than flamboyance, preparation rather than improvisation, and governance as service rather than spectacle. At a time when Osun requires careful rebuilding of institutions and trust, such qualities are not merely desirable; they are essential. Leadership in difficult times is measured by restraint, clarity, and the courage to make informed decisions even when they are unpopular.
This election, therefore, transcends partisan loyalty. It is a referendum on the kind of political culture Osun wishes to entrench. Will the state continue along a path where visibility substitutes for viability, or will it choose a leadership grounded in competence, experience, and institutional respect? The answer to this question will shape Osun’s trajectory for years to come.In all ramifications; academic preparation, administrative experience, grassroots engagement, party organization, and leadership temperament; AMBO emerges as the more credible candidate for the Osun governorship in 2026. His candidacy represents a return to seriousness in public life, a reaffirmation of merit over melodrama, and a commitment to governance as a disciplined craft rather than a public performance. Osun does not need luck, nor does it need theatrics. It needs leadership anchored in substance and guided by stewardship. In this historic moment, Munirudeen Oyebamiji stands as the candidate best equipped to provide that leadership and to steer Osun State toward a more stable, purposeful, and dignified future.
Oni is a professor of Sociology in the Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education, University of Lagos.
Leave a Reply